Which one is better. I have to decide which one is going to my grandfather. I dont wanna be cheap but i want the best one. Lemme know
-truggy
P3 500 vs. Celeron 466
Moderators: Admin, Moderator Team
P3 500 vs. Celeron 466
[url=http://profile.xfire.com/xerojohny88][img]http://miniprofile.xfire.com/bg/bg/type/0/xerojohny88.png[/img][/url]
--
Dance Dance Revolution: Proving white people dont have rhythm since 1998
--
Dance Dance Revolution: Proving white people dont have rhythm since 1998
-
Grant
- Moderator
- Posts: 2982
- Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2002 3:24 am
- Location: Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
- Contact:
RE: P3 500 vs. Celeron 466
you would have too choose Pentium over Celeron, personally speaking
RE: P3 500 vs. Celeron 466
Celerons suck when it comes to floating point maths. Go for the Pentium 3.
-
Skitz-O-Phrenia
- Senior Member
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2003 4:46 am
- Location: CA, USA
- Contact:
RE: P3 500 vs. Celeron 466
yup, p3... celery sux
-
El Brenty
- Moderator
- Posts: 2030
- Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 8:37 pm
- Location: Esher, Surrey, Land Of Hope And Glory
- Contact:
RE: P3 500 vs. Celeron 466
If you can, get a P3 550, but the P3 500 is a nice and stable processor. We will see these coming up as second hand for many years to come. It was one of those "We can't do any more with technology at the moment, this is as good as it's going to get" moments. Personally, I think Intel have been struggling to advance the P4 processor family enough. Roll on the next generation.
This is why AMD have taken a chunk out of the market recently.
Celerons were a cut down version of the P3 processor, used for low-end systems.
This is why AMD have taken a chunk out of the market recently.
Celerons were a cut down version of the P3 processor, used for low-end systems.
Moderating behind the bushes!