Just a few quick questions
Moderators: Admin, Moderator Team
-
- Posting Freak
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 11:26 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Just a few quick questions
I know lots of you know quite a great deal about computers, so I have a few questions to ask before I buy a new one in a few days.
- Im getting a dvd +/- rw drive for sure, so do I even need to bother getting a cd rw/dvd rom drive as well? Oh, and what about the new dual layered burners?
- What is the great deal about windows xp pro? Is it really worth the extra money?
- Im getting a dvd +/- rw drive for sure, so do I even need to bother getting a cd rw/dvd rom drive as well? Oh, and what about the new dual layered burners?
- What is the great deal about windows xp pro? Is it really worth the extra money?
-
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 923
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2003 8:59 pm
- Location: New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
well, i would get a DVD +/- RW drive and a regular dvd-RW drive. This is only because i would be afraid of putting strain on the burner with everyday use, especially since they are more expensive. Also, the dual layered ones are nice, so if you want one, i'd go with it, cuz u get twice as much on a disk. As far as Pro, it's really not necessary, and to tell you the truth, i don't even know why i got it. However, one program i saw once said it required pro, but i have no clue why. I'd go with home, unless u want some of the administrative and networking features that come with pro.
CEO
Dimension 9 Studios
Dimension 9 Studios
-
- Posting Freak
- Posts: 310
- Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 6:18 am
- Location: Alberta, Canada
- Contact:
WHOA!!! I'd definitely get pro.
Right now, I've got win xp home on this computer, and it works fine, but has some MAJOR disadvantages. For instance, I've tried to install visual studio .net, but it doesn't work because for some reason, home doesn't let it do certain vital things like open c libraries etc. Then, vegas 5 doesn't work too well as home doesn't lend it enough writing rights, so when rendering or editing, it's slow as hell. My other computer has windows xp pro and has never crashed or shut down suddenly without any reason, this computer has already 19 (!) times. And lots of plugins and mods for games, cgi progs and programming interfaces don't work as expected. So get pro, it will get you out of a hell lot of trouble.
Oh and pro has user policies for every imaginable windows filesystem/regedit object. So for me, that's a major advantage too.
Right now, I've got win xp home on this computer, and it works fine, but has some MAJOR disadvantages. For instance, I've tried to install visual studio .net, but it doesn't work because for some reason, home doesn't let it do certain vital things like open c libraries etc. Then, vegas 5 doesn't work too well as home doesn't lend it enough writing rights, so when rendering or editing, it's slow as hell. My other computer has windows xp pro and has never crashed or shut down suddenly without any reason, this computer has already 19 (!) times. And lots of plugins and mods for games, cgi progs and programming interfaces don't work as expected. So get pro, it will get you out of a hell lot of trouble.
Oh and pro has user policies for every imaginable windows filesystem/regedit object. So for me, that's a major advantage too.
[img]http://home.quicknet.nl/qn/prive/c.nijssen-parhan/banner1.JPG[/img]
Pro is definitely the way to go. The home interface for configuring networking sux, and generally everything that you would want to configure on the file system security wise is done thru wizards, to a Windows default. While that same interface is available in Pro, the default is to allow standard NT like granular security settings. Overall Pro seems more stable than Home. WHile they both basically run the same kernel, many of th eother core files are different, and the HAL (Hardware Abstraction Layer )is also different between the two. The HAL in Pro just seems more stable, and seems to have better support for some types of hardware.
The UNDERGROUND
[url]http://theundergroundtv.com[/url]
Music television for unsigned bands
[url]http://theundergroundtv.com[/url]
Music television for unsigned bands
-
- Posting Freak
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 11:26 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Are you sure you don't mean a cd rw driver, because I don't see what the point in getting two dvd burners is?U.S.Amateurfilmaker wrote:well, i would get a DVD +/- RW drive and a regular dvd-RW drive.
Also for processor speed, Im probably going to get at least over 3 ghz. Will I notice a big difference between 3.2 ghz and 3.4 ghz?
-
- Posting Freak
- Posts: 310
- Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 6:18 am
- Location: Alberta, Canada
- Contact:
you are not getting two dvd burners, with a multistandard burner you get one burner that can burn dvd+r(w) as well as dvd-r(w), which is REALLY handy. I can tell, I burn dvd's really much, and just recently I bought a stack of mixed dvd's (10 dvd+/-r's) and two dvd-rw's, I can all burn them, and that's a comfort to know. You can just buy the cheapest grub available at a certain point in time, and don't have to worry if your dvd burner is going to be able to burn it. The price doesn't matter that much, differences are about 20-40 dollars, which you won't notice when you burn a lot. I burn about 200 gigs a year, plus some times a dvd+/-rw and of course cd's (for the looneys that haven't got a dvdplayer in their computer).
[img]http://home.quicknet.nl/qn/prive/c.nijssen-parhan/banner1.JPG[/img]
-
- Posting Freak
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 11:26 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
-
- Posting Freak
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 11:26 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Well after long hours of researching I have figured out everything I want, yet I still have yet to decide the processor. It's either the pentium 4 3.2 ghz, or the amd 64 3200+. For both I have picked out the motherboard, in case I make up a last miniute decision. Right now it's the pentium 4, since I have heard they are better for video editing. They are also about the same price, pentium 4 is about $20 more. Plus, even though windows is going 64 bit combatible, not every program is, so I don't see the big rush. Anyways I can't really make a wrong decision.
-
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 923
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2003 8:59 pm
- Location: New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
sorry, I meant a regular dvd-rom drive, not rw, my bad. lol. And yes, getting 2 would be pointlesspan-modo_pictures wrote:Are you sure you don't mean a cd rw driver, because I don't see what the point in getting two dvd burners is?U.S.Amateurfilmaker wrote:well, i would get a DVD +/- RW drive and a regular dvd-RW drive.
Also for processor speed, Im probably going to get at least over 3 ghz. Will I notice a big difference between 3.2 ghz and 3.4 ghz?
CEO
Dimension 9 Studios
Dimension 9 Studios
oh so true, I guess it's the price you should be worried about with that config, so preferably try to find a p4 for that 20 dollars less and else just take the cheapest configuration. It's mega anyways.pan-modo_pictures wrote:Well after long hours of researching I have figured out everything I want, yet I still have yet to decide the processor. It's either the pentium 4 3.2 ghz, or the amd 64 3200+. For both I have picked out the motherboard, in case I make up a last miniute decision. Right now it's the pentium 4, since I have heard they are better for video editing. They are also about the same price, pentium 4 is about $20 more. Plus, even though windows is going 64 bit combatible, not every program is, so I don't see the big rush. Anyways I can't really make a wrong decision.
And don't forget the endless conversations on this forum about RAM! get enough! (1-1,5 GB pc3200)
[img]http://home.quicknet.nl/qn/prive/c.nijssen-parhan/banner1.JPG[/img]
-
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 923
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2003 8:59 pm
- Location: New Jersey, USA
- Contact:
-
- Posting Freak
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 11:26 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Well Im back and extremely happy. I went with the pentium 4 3.20 ghz, 1024 mb ram, dvd -/+ drive, floppy drive, 2 120 gb hard drives, cool master case, albatron motherboard, keyboard, mouse, etc. The main reason I didn't go with the amd 64 was because I heard from many sources that the pentium 4 was a bit better for video editing, and amd 64 was better for games. Anyways the prices were basically the same. I'd also like to thank all of you in helping with my decision
-
- Member
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 2:41 am
- Location: Wisconsin, USA
-
- Posting Freak
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 11:26 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Well the ram is ocz high performance, so it's pretty good stuff. I just built it today, and I was succesful. When that computer first went into bios, I was jumping around with excitement. It actually didn't cost a huge amount of money. It came to just under $2000 canadian with tax. Anyways during bios, when I first went to partition the c drive, I accidentally made it to small, and I would like it bigger. Does anyone know how I can fix this by making a bigger partition.
If you set the size too snall in Bios, then you're kind of hosed, You diodn't create the partition in Bios, you laid out the physical fomratting of the cylionders/heads/sectors. If you set it to the correct settings then it won't reboot from teh current install. Best suggestion would be to set the BIOS to autodetect sdrive, then reinstall OS.. If you sized it wrong during the XP install then you could use partition magic to resize the partition. The difference bertween the two, the bios lays out the sector alignment, on a physical level partitioning assigns these sectprs to a given entry in the partition table - a logical operation...
The UNDERGROUND
[url]http://theundergroundtv.com[/url]
Music television for unsigned bands
[url]http://theundergroundtv.com[/url]
Music television for unsigned bands
- justsomeguy
- Posting Freak
- Posts: 425
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 7:22 pm
- Location: CA, USA
if you have $400 and can build it you can get a pretty nice computer if you get everything at the right place. proc 2.4 p4 for $157:how much did all that cost????? i have no money and i envy you.....plus my computer sucks.....
http://www.newegg.com/app/viewProductDe ... 157&depa=0
get a mobo for about $100
video card for about $100
at frys electronics they have 512mb of 3200 me for $60
then just use your existing hdd (or spend $90 or so for a 200 gb. also at fry's) and monitor and maybe case and powersupply and your set. doubt they have a fry's where you are tho, but im sure you could find a place with close prices
Baggage:::: www.criticalcows.ne1.net
New episode coming by the end of the month!
New episode coming by the end of the month!
-
- Posting Freak
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 11:26 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2003 4:46 am
- Location: CA, USA
- Contact: