Post-Production Camera Shake?

All aspects of low budget special effects.

Moderators: Admin, Moderator Team

Post Reply
John Groshko
Posting Freak
Posting Freak
Posts: 310
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 6:18 am
Location: Alberta, Canada
Contact:

Post-Production Camera Shake?

Post by John Groshko »

Does anybody know how to create a realistic-looking camera shake in post-production?

I've tried using the motion mixer in Permiere 6.5; but, I could never get it to look right.

Any suggestions?
El Brenty
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2030
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 8:37 pm
Location: Esher, Surrey, Land Of Hope And Glory
Contact:

Post by El Brenty »

That's a toughie! I have no idea! I'd say shake the VCR around a bit, but if it don't work, then don't be blamin' me man!:cool:
Moderating behind the bushes!
HetH
Member
Member
Posts: 71
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 8:29 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by HetH »

In Premiere it might not be impossible, but I think it wouldn´t look too good. IF you have After Effects too use that instead. Put your video into a composition and make it a bit bigger than the comp window so you have space to all four directions. Now activate Motion blurring for this composition and of course for your video. Set a position keyframe and then move the video every few frames, AE will then set keframes for each position change. When rendered out, the video will look like the camera has been shaken heavily during recording.

Hope this helps!
Regards,
HetH
[URL=http://www.clickcops.com/invasion/]
[img]http://www.clickcorps.com/invasion/invasion_banner.jpg[/img]
[/URL]
Ornsack
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1520
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2002 11:43 pm
Location: Bristol, England
Contact:

Post by Ornsack »

When we were doing Shosk I used 3D Studio to add camera shake. You can assign a video plain to your mouse so you can shake the mouse and the movement will be transferred to the video. Then add the motion blur and people need never know that it was once a still shot ;)
[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=loFABl-1Zcw]THE SALESMAN - YouTube[/url]
foxwood
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran
Posts: 2446
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2003 8:20 pm
Location: Vrigina Commonwelth University
Contact:

Post by foxwood »

call me old fashoned but couldn't you just shake the camera in production, get a real camera shake, do a take with and a take with out incase you screw it up. Don't do in post what you can do in cam.
grison
Member
Member
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2003 12:37 pm

Post by grison »

Thing is, if you want to add a cg explosion or muzzle flash or something it can get VERY anoying. You would have to track the material and that can be very annoying.

You really should shake the camera in post. You have the bigger control over everything, e.g. over Blur and so.

But generally I am with u, because what you can do in the real world you should do in the real world. You have to consider scene by scene.

[Edited on 20-7-2003 by grison]

[Edited on 20-7-2003 by grison]
Matt
Webmaster
Webmaster
Posts: 627
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 10:28 am
Location: Bristol, England
Contact:

Post by Matt »

There is a set of plugins for After Effects and Premiere called Aurorix (http://www.polar-graphics.com/digieffects_index.html). This set includes a plugin called Earthquake that adds good camera shake.
John Groshko
Posting Freak
Posting Freak
Posts: 310
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 6:18 am
Location: Alberta, Canada
Contact:

Thanks!

Post by John Groshko »

I will download immediately!
El Brenty
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2030
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 8:37 pm
Location: Esher, Surrey, Land Of Hope And Glory
Contact:

Post by El Brenty »

I'd go with skaking the camera, but I thought the question was about post-production because the scene had been filmed already?!:o
Moderating behind the bushes!
Grant
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2982
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2002 3:24 am
Location: Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
Contact:

Post by Grant »

Yeah, why not do it live during the shoot?
John Groshko
Posting Freak
Posting Freak
Posts: 310
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 6:18 am
Location: Alberta, Canada
Contact:

Post by John Groshko »

It's for the Special FX's.

Adding CGI to a motionless shot, is much easier then adding them to a shot were the camera is bouncing up and down.
Post Reply